[Beaker-devel] Docs/overview for using autotest in Beaker?

Don Zickus dzickus at redhat.com
Thu Nov 7 14:24:43 UTC 2013


On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 04:52:32AM -0500, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> Don,
> 
> Thanks for your help. It's certainly needed and much appreciatted.
> 
> But, I had to take this week as PTO because of some unforeseen events, so I won't be able to follow up in a timely manner. Next week I'll get to you and hopefully we'll expedite this and get it done.
> 
> I'll ping you early next week.

I just requested acls on that package in the meantime.  I will look to see
if I can sponsor you (or find someone who can :-) ).

Cheers,
Don

> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> ----- Don Zickus <dzickus at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:00:15AM -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > > On 11/05/2013 12:00 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > > >On 11/05/2013 07:51 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > >>On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:33:33PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > > >>>Ping :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Even a cursory blog post somewhere (or a reply to this email!)
> > > >>>explaining to people how to *experiment* with this would be helpful. At
> > > >>>the moment I'm having to point people at the merged pull request to say
> > > >>>"Yes, in theory, you can use the upcoming version of autotest as a
> > > >>>Beaker test harness", but I have zero resources to give them on how to
> > > >>>actually run it (because I don't actually know myself).
> > > >>
> > > >>So playing with things a little more..
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>1. How do you get the experimental version of autotest to play with? Is
> > > >>>there a pre-built RPM somewhere that people can use, or do they have to
> > > >>>build their own?
> > > >>
> > > >>Unfortunately, I see autotest-0.15 has not been packaged with Fedora 20
> > > >>for some reason.
> > > >>
> > > >>Lucas,
> > > >>
> > > >>Why is Fedora using a version of autotest from a year ago instead of
> > > >>something far more recent????
> > > 
> > > Because it is a big PITA to get Fedora to approve new package reviewers.
> > > 
> > > It is been months that cleber is dilligently going from review to
> > > review to finally become one, but it usually takes 20 days every
> > > iteration. At this staggering rate, he'll become a Fedora package
> > > mantainer by 2016. Seriously, I've been thinking "ok, now the
> > > package maintainership thing will be sorted out any minute now" for
> > > the past 4 months.
> > > 
> > > Now once he becomes a package maintainer, up to date packages will
> > > start to show up.
> > 
> > Odd. Maybe that is for new packages. For existing packages it has taken
> > me less than a week to get approved to become a maintainer (with commit
> > privileges) for a package.
> > 
> > Cleber, can you point me to some of the hold-ups on getting you approved?
> > Being in Westford, I might be able to poke people directly to move things
> > along quicker. 20 days seems awfully long and would be a big turn-off to
> > get new Fedora contributors/maintainers (something I assumed Fedora wanted
> > to avoid).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> 


More information about the Beaker-devel mailing list