[Beaker-devel] Docs/overview for using autotest in Beaker?
Cleber Rosa
crosa at redhat.com
Thu Dec 5 19:43:35 UTC 2013
Don,
First thing I tried was asking Martin the same thing. He told me that it did not depend on him, and that I'd have to go though the process of becoming a maintainer.
Having walked all those miles, even if becoming a general package maintainer wasn't really necessary, I think it's the one to go because we do have other packages (such as python-arc itself) that we want to have in Fedora.
Cheers,
CR.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Zickus" <dzickus at redhat.com>
> To: "Cleber Rosa" <crosa at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Beaker development" <beaker-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>, "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <lmr at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:57:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Beaker-devel] Docs/overview for using autotest in Beaker?
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:38:58PM -0300, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > >
> > >Cleber, can you point me to some of the hold-ups on getting you approved?
> > >Being in Westford, I might be able to poke people directly to move things
> > >along quicker. 20 days seems awfully long and would be a big turn-off to
> > >get new Fedora contributors/maintainers (something I assumed Fedora wanted
> > >to avoid).
> >
> > Don,
> >
> > Now would be a good time to get some help here.
> >
> > Please check the package review BZ at:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985967
>
> Dumb question. What are you trying to achieve with that bugzilla? Are
> you just trying to become a developer with commit access to the autotest
> package? Or something bigger like a generic package maintainer?
>
> The above bugzilla seems to imply the latter hence all the pushback. The
> former should be easier as all it needs is approval from Martin (though I
> requested approval a month ago and have heard nothing).
>
> Cheers,
> Don
>
More information about the Beaker-devel
mailing list