[Beaker-devel] Docs/overview for using autotest in Beaker?

Cleber Rosa crosa at redhat.com
Thu Dec 5 19:43:35 UTC 2013


Don,

First thing I tried was asking Martin the same thing. He told me that it did not depend on him, and that I'd have to go though the process of becoming a maintainer.

Having walked all those miles, even if becoming a general package maintainer wasn't really necessary, I think it's the one to go because we do have other packages (such as python-arc itself) that we want to have in Fedora.

Cheers,
CR.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Zickus" <dzickus at redhat.com>
> To: "Cleber Rosa" <crosa at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Beaker development" <beaker-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>, "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <lmr at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:57:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Beaker-devel] Docs/overview for using autotest in Beaker?
> 
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:38:58PM -0300, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > >
> > >Cleber, can you point me to some of the hold-ups on getting you approved?
> > >Being in Westford, I might be able to poke people directly to move things
> > >along quicker.  20 days seems awfully long and would be a big turn-off to
> > >get new Fedora contributors/maintainers (something I assumed Fedora wanted
> > >to avoid).
> > 
> > Don,
> > 
> > Now would be a good time to get some help here.
> > 
> > Please check the package review BZ at:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985967
> 
> Dumb question.  What are you trying to achieve with that bugzilla?  Are
> you just trying to become a developer with commit access to the autotest
> package?  Or something bigger like a generic package maintainer?
> 
> The above bugzilla seems to imply the latter hence all the pushback.  The
> former should be easier as all it needs is approval from Martin (though I
> requested approval a month ago and have heard nothing).
> 
> Cheers,
> Don
> 


More information about the Beaker-devel mailing list