[rhinstaller/blivet/pulls/124 master] Master keepers b
vpodzime
installerbot-noreply at redhat.com
Mon May 25 13:08:04 UTC 2015
The RE in this version is better, but I don't understand why do don't just split the numeric and "unit" parts and then try to create a ``Decimal()`` instance from the numeric part. If that works, we are good, if not, we are doomed anyway. I think we are adding artificial restrictions caused by our custom, buggy-or-not RE what we care for is already covered somewhere else -- by the ``Decimal()`` constructor.
--
To view this pull request on github, visit https://github.com/rhinstaller/blivet/pull/124
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list