[PATCH] Actually add the new definition of an already-defined repo.
Vratislav Podzimek
vpodzime at redhat.com
Tue Jan 20 17:26:21 UTC 2015
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 11:33 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> I left these two lines out of my previous patch.
> ---
> pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py b/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py
> index d0eb90e..0fd3ac3 100644
> --- a/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py
> +++ b/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py
> @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ class DNFPayload(packaging.PackagePayload):
> self._base.repos[repo.id].enable()
> else:
> self._base.repos.pop(repo.id)
> + self._base.repos.add(repo)
> + repo.enable()
> # If the repo's not already known, we've got to add it.
> else:
> self._base.repos.add(repo)
Makes sense to me. ACK.
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list