[PATCH] test the reclaim dialog
Chris Lumens
clumens at redhat.com
Fri Nov 14 15:28:21 UTC 2014
> I don't think there's any benefit in constructing a DeviceTree and then
> making changes in it for something simple like that. Maybe in the future
> when there are 'part' and 'fs' libblockdev's plugins (not a high
> priority now, though) we could use it here.
There's not necessarily any benefit to me using devicetree for this
except for the fact that it's code that already exists.
> What about using less memory to also test everything (including zram)
> works even with less RAM? From my experience the installation with less
> RAM doesn't take significantly more time.
I used to have these tests consume 1 GB of memory each, and that was
enough to make them work most of the time. However I didn't want my GUI
tests to fail because of not enough memory, so that is why they are
currently so high.
I could certainly add a test case for lower memory situations, though.
In fact it would be possible to write a test case that ran over and over
again with less memory until it failed, at which point we'd know what
the minimum requirement was.
> Do we have a test for the Progress hub behaving properly when spokes are
> not completed, the "Finish configuration" button appears but
> insensitive, then they are completed and the "Finish configuration"
> button can/should be clicked? I've never seen it broken, but I'm not
> sure how much it is tested because people usually enter rootpw or user
> information during package installation.
This is exactly what my first test does.
- Chris
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list