[blivet:rhel7:master 0/3] #1090009 related patches

Vratislav Podzimek vpodzime at redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 09:34:59 UTC 2014

On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 14:33 -0500, mulhern wrote:
> The first is just a name change, trivial.
> The second is really simple.
> The third bears a look from someone who has a better idea of the actual
> impact of that lvm_cc_filter stuff.
If I understand it correctly, not filtering out the device may result in
a situation when LVM would have a different view of an LVM setup than we
would because LVM would e.g. list such imperfect device in the list of
VG's PVs, but we wouldn't know that device (it won't be in the device
tree, right?). That might be quite a problem, especially in combination
with things like LVM RAID and such things. However, I'm not sure that
would be an issue in cases where imperfect devices are
supported/enabled. I think this needs some testing on the case it tries
to improve.

Vratislav Podzimek

Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic

More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list