[master] Protect/hide zRAM devices properly

Brian C. Lane bcl at redhat.com
Fri Aug 1 20:28:48 UTC 2014


On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:07:20AM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 16:01 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 15:40 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > > > We use zRAM devices as swaps so they should be protected and hidden from the
> > > > user.
> > > Forgot to mention that I don't understand why only removable protected
> > > devices were hidden. If anybody has a clue, please share that wisdom.
> > 
> > This is to hide the install media.
> Well, the install media is protected and removable. Which means that
> checking protected should be enough and I cannot come up with any
> example where it could be wrong.

I can't remember any specific cases -- but we seem to re-fix hiding the
media in every release so I'd err on the side of leaving it unless it is
causing problems for something else.

-- 
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)


More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list