[blivet:master 8/9] Add a bunch of E1120 errors to the false positives file

mulhern amulhern at redhat.com
Thu Apr 3 17:32:13 UTC 2014


The analysis does not detect correctly that raid.RAID* refers to a singleton
object, rather than a class. I believe that this ought to be in the scope
of the analysis and so expect to remove these false positives when the analysis
is fixed.

Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern at redhat.com>
---
 tests/pylint/pylint-false-positives | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/pylint/pylint-false-positives b/tests/pylint/pylint-false-positives
index e69de29..b6d7e63 100644
--- a/tests/pylint/pylint-false-positives
+++ b/tests/pylint/pylint-false-positives
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+^tests/devicelibs_test/raid_test.py:[[:digit:]]+: \[E1120\(no\-value\-for\-parameter\), [[:alnum:]\.]+\] No value passed for parameter 'member_count' in function call$
+^tests/devicelibs_test/raid_test.py:[[:digit:]]+: \[E1120\(no\-value\-for\-parameter\), [[:alnum:]\.]+\] No value passed for parameter 'smallest_member_size' in function call$
-- 
1.8.3.1



More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list