[PATCH] Do not BuildRequire python-bugzilla on RHEL (#953182)

David Cantrell dcantrell at redhat.com
Thu May 2 02:07:52 UTC 2013


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:47:06PM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 11:06 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Similar to hfsplus, conditionalize out this BuildRequire so it is not in
> > effect on RHEL systems.
> > ---
> >  anaconda.spec.in |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/anaconda.spec.in b/anaconda.spec.in
> > index ffe6075..1af34e2 100644
> > --- a/anaconda.spec.in
> > +++ b/anaconda.spec.in
> > @@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ Requires: firewalld >= %{firewalldver}
> >  Requires: util-linux >= %{utillinuxver}
> >  Requires: dbus-python
> >  Requires: python-pwquality
> > +%if ! 0%{?rhel}
> >  Requires: python-bugzilla
> > +%endif
> >  Requires: python-IPy
> >  Requires: python-nss
> >  Requires: tigervnc-server-minimal
> Looks good to me, but anybody knows why we need python-bugzilla as
> "Requires"? Shouldn't it be "BuildRequires"?

It should technically be a BuildRequires, but even that way it would still
impose a requirement on what needs to be in RHEL-7.  Which is the goal of
conditionalizing it out.  I can change it to BuildRequires so it's more
accurate.

Thanks,

-- 
David Cantrell <dcantrell at redhat.com>
Manager, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT


More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list