[PATCH 3/3] Don't try to update spokes that are indirect.

Chris Lumens clumens at redhat.com
Mon Feb 18 15:51:41 UTC 2013

This was just minor confusion.  It's not the spoke being processed that
we need to be concerned about.  It's all the ones that might get their
incompleteness checked.
 pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py b/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py
index f41cad7..75e0309 100644
--- a/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py
+++ b/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py
@@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ class Hub(GUIObject, common.Hub):
         self._inSpoke = False
         # Now update the selector with the current status and completeness.
-        if not spoke.indirect:
-            for sp in self._spokes.itervalues():
+        for sp in self._spokes.itervalues():
+            if not sp.indirect:
         # And then if that spoke wants us to jump straight to another one,

More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list