[PATCH 3/3] Don't try to update spokes that are indirect.
Chris Lumens
clumens at redhat.com
Mon Feb 18 15:51:41 UTC 2013
This was just minor confusion. It's not the spoke being processed that
we need to be concerned about. It's all the ones that might get their
incompleteness checked.
---
pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py b/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py
index f41cad7..75e0309 100644
--- a/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py
+++ b/pyanaconda/ui/gui/hubs/__init__.py
@@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ class Hub(GUIObject, common.Hub):
self._inSpoke = False
# Now update the selector with the current status and completeness.
- if not spoke.indirect:
- for sp in self._spokes.itervalues():
+ for sp in self._spokes.itervalues():
+ if not sp.indirect:
self._updateCompleteness(sp)
# And then if that spoke wants us to jump straight to another one,
--
1.8.1.2
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list