[PATCH 4/6] Remove a whole bunch of unused stuff from Blivet.
David Lehman
dlehman at redhat.com
Fri Dec 13 18:13:55 UTC 2013
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:58 -0500, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chris Lumens" <clumens at redhat.com>
> > To: anaconda-patches at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:10:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Remove a whole bunch of unused stuff from Blivet.
> >
> > > > - def doEncryptionPassphraseRetrofits(self):
> > > > - """ Add the global passphrase to all preexisting LUKS devices.
> > > > -
> > > > - This establishes a common passphrase for all encrypted
> > > > devices
> > > > - in the system so that users only have to enter one
> > > > passphrase
> > > > - during system boot.
> > > > - """
> > > > - if not self.encryptionRetrofit:
> > > > - return
> > > > -
> > > > - for device in self.devices:
> > > > - if device.format.type == "luks" and \
> > > > - device.format._LUKS__passphrase !=
> > > > self.encryptionPassphrase:
> > > > - log.info("adding new passphrase to preexisting encrypted
> > > > "
> > > > - "device %s" % device.path)
> > > > - try:
> > > > -
> > > > device.format.addPassphrase(self.encryptionPassphrase)
> > > > - except CryptoError:
> > > > - log.error("failed to add new passphrase to existing
> > > > "
> > > > - "device %s" % device.path)
> > > > -
> > >
> > > This seems to be still used by doIt @ line 311.
> >
> > Nothing in blivet sets self.encryptionRetrofit = True, at least.
>
> Seems like along with the original patch it would make sense to remove the encryptionRetrofit field entirely.
>
> The only thing that uses it is this method that is being removed.
Done in my working tree here.
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list