[PATCH 2/2] Fail on incomplete ksdata when in cmdline mode

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Sep 27 18:03:56 UTC 2012


On 09/27/2012 10:45 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 10:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 01:42 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>>> I understand that this is good for the consistency with the previous
>>> releases, but appart from that, what is this good for? Why should we do
>>> something like that now that our text mode is basically command-line
>>> mode and*can*  have a question? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> I don't claim to understand the use case for cmdline, but it was
>> suggested to me that we continue to support the way it works.  The code
>> is minimal to support it, and can be easily removed in the future if
>> deemed necessary.
> I hope so. While I understand that we should support cmdline, I don't
> understand why we would have to raise exception in case some info is missing.
>

Because that's what cmdline meant.  No prompting, if you're missing 
stuff error out.  If you're willing to be prompted for missing data, use 
text or graphical.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!


More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list