fix some blockers and some future/potential blockers

Brian C. Lane bcl at redhat.com
Thu Dec 6 00:40:41 UTC 2012


On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:45:27PM -0600, David Lehman wrote:
> Patch 6 deserves some explanation, as does patch 7.
> 
> For preexisting devices, if there is encryption below the layers
> we can alter (eg: lvm pvs) we should never ever set the encryption
> checkbutton sensitive since it is impossible to turn off encryption
> for such a device without removing it. We already had this covered
> when setting up the customization area, but I dropped the ball in
> the on_reformat_toggled handler by not taking this complexity into
> account.
> 
> Patch 7 adds a udev_settle() call at the bottom of udev_trigger.
> This prevents the possibility of getting into DeviceTree.populate
> before the udev queue has settled from our trigger call, which could
> potentially lead to missing info in the udevdb.

ACK to all of these.

-- 
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/anaconda-patches/attachments/20121205/e3f4c5b2/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the anaconda-patches mailing list