[PATCH website] get_it: added fedora 17

Maros Zatko mzatko at redhat.com
Thu Jun 28 16:44:44 UTC 2012


On 06/27/2012 10:28 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 27/06/2012, at 10:58 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 26/06/2012, at 4:20 AM, mzatko at redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Maros Zatko<mzatko at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> nanocsite/content/get_it.haml |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/nanocsite/content/get_it.haml b/nanocsite/content/get_it.haml
>>> index 6338638..b80d9ac 100644
>>> --- a/nanocsite/content/get_it.haml
>>> +++ b/nanocsite/content/get_it.haml
>>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ title: Aeolus | Get It
>>>   Stable Release - 0.9.0
>> Thanks Maros, good thinking. :)
>>
>> Personally, I'm kind of thinking we should point people at 0.10.x stuff now as
>> our newest "stable" release, instead of 0.9.0. ;>
>>
>> + For Fedora 17, 0.9.0 doesn't work properly at all (various issues), whereas
>>    whereas 0.10.x seems to be "getting there".
>>
>> + For Fedora 16, 0.10.x works ok for most things.  There's a bug in user data
>>    passing that affects Audrey users, but a fix for that should be packaged up
>>    and available in a few days.
>>
>> With that in mind, I'll push your patch today, then apply some 0.10.x stuff
>> on top of it right away.  (Will need to put together a brief "release
>> announcement" type blurb for 0.10.x too)
>
> Heh, we kind of went in a completely different direction.  The Fedora 17 rpms
> aren't quite ready yet (SELinux fixes still coming through), so it's a very simple
> Fedora 16 only install for the moment. ;)
>
>    http://www.aeolusproject.org/get_it.html
>
> + Justin
>
> --
> Aeolus Community Manager
> http://www.aeolusproject.org
>
Thanks for the info, and for the 'review' as well :)

Maros



More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list