Audrey server -> should be ok on i386?

jrd at redhat.com jrd at redhat.com
Fri Jun 22 13:39:51 UTC 2012


>    From: Dan Radez <dradez at redhat.com>
>    Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:34:14 -0400
>    
>    On 06/22/2012 09:30 AM, jrd at redhat.com wrote:
>    >>    From: Justin Clift <jclift at redhat.com>
>    >>    Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:39:58 +1000
>    >>    
>    >>    Hi Dan,
>    >>    
>    >>    Should Audrey's (config) server run ok on i386 hosts?
>    >>    
>    >>    Thinking that unlike other parts of the Aeolus stack - which we "advertise"
>    >>    as 64-bit only - Audrey probably doesn't have to be.
>    >>    
>    >>    Being able to run on i386 vs just x64 *might* help keep deployment costs
>    >>    minimised.
>    >>    
>    >>    Even though EC2 Micro instances can be either 32 or 64 bit, other cloud
>    >>    providers may be different. (no idea personally :>)
>    >>    
>    > 
>    > It's python, so I can't think of a reason why it would care.
>    > 
>    
>    just to clear up the "It's"
>    
>    audrey config server is ruby
>    audrey agent is python
>    
>    Dan
>
D'oh!  That's what I get for answering too fast.  Sorry for the
confusion.  


/me hides under desk...



More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list