Audrey server -> should be ok on i386?
jrd at redhat.com
jrd at redhat.com
Fri Jun 22 13:39:51 UTC 2012
> From: Dan Radez <dradez at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:34:14 -0400
>
> On 06/22/2012 09:30 AM, jrd at redhat.com wrote:
> >> From: Justin Clift <jclift at redhat.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:39:58 +1000
> >>
> >> Hi Dan,
> >>
> >> Should Audrey's (config) server run ok on i386 hosts?
> >>
> >> Thinking that unlike other parts of the Aeolus stack - which we "advertise"
> >> as 64-bit only - Audrey probably doesn't have to be.
> >>
> >> Being able to run on i386 vs just x64 *might* help keep deployment costs
> >> minimised.
> >>
> >> Even though EC2 Micro instances can be either 32 or 64 bit, other cloud
> >> providers may be different. (no idea personally :>)
> >>
> >
> > It's python, so I can't think of a reason why it would care.
> >
>
> just to clear up the "It's"
>
> audrey config server is ruby
> audrey agent is python
>
> Dan
>
D'oh! That's what I get for answering too fast. Sorry for the
confusion.
/me hides under desk...
More information about the aeolus-devel
mailing list