[katello-devel] Cloud Engine - System Engine V2 integration

Ivan Nečas inecas at redhat.com
Tue Jul 17 16:05:49 UTC 2012


On 07/17/2012 05:57 PM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 09:29 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:57:04AM -0400, Chris Alfonso wrote:
>>> On 17/07/12 08:15 -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>> --snip--
>>>> This data would be in the kickstart tempaltes.. yes? I assume if
>>>> we go with TDL, we will need a way to translate the ks file which
>>>> foreman generates into TDL. Or, could we:
>>>>
>>>> 1) have an alternate TDL tempalte
>>>> 2) ditch TDL and have image factory get the kickstart from foreman 
>>>> directly?
>>>>
>>> Image Factory hands the TDL off to Oz. Ditching TDL would mean Image 
>>> Factory ditches Oz, and I think the scope of work would quickly 
>>> increase.  I recommend we do not ditch TDL and instead translate the 
>>> ks from foreman into a valid TDL.
>>> https://github.com/clalancette/oz/blob/master/docs/tdl.rng
>>
>> Fair enough. I think both BK and I would prefer to de-emphasize TDL as
>> a first-class citizen -- i.e. something we document and tell people
>> "you must write your component outlines this way" -- but I see no
>> reason to rush around and make more work for ourselves by ditching it
>> in a hurry.
>
>
> Fair enough. If we get an "image record" into katello, we have the API 
> point. From then on, it is just deciding who makes the api call, and 
> if it is push or pull.
Right. I will try to sum up the things we have discussed into a wiki 
page to have it on one place.

-- Ivan
>
> -- bk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel


-- 
Ivan




More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list