aeolus-configure 2.6.1

Garik Khachikyan gkhachik at redhat.com
Tue Jul 17 09:46:41 UTC 2012


On 16/07/12 18:00, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 17/07/2012, at 1:06 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>> Dear Justin,
>>
>> you increased Karma on aeolus-configure:
>>
>> justinclift - 2012-07-13 13:46:08 (karma 1)
>> Yeah, that's on purpose.  It's supposed to be created
>> automatically again now (like it did in older
>> versions), without needing to be specified on the
>> command line.
>>
>> But as mentioned on the mailinglist, the admin account is not created automatically using this version of the scripts.
> Well asked. :)
>
> There are two er... "matching sets" of rpms to know about here:
>
>    a) aeolus-conductor v 0.10.4, with
>       aeolus-configure v 2.6.0
>
>    b) aeolus-conductor v 0.10.5, with
>       aeolus-configure v 2.6.1
>
> By "matched sets" I'm meaning that mixing between them
> (ie conductor 0.10.5 + configure 2.6.0) results in a broken
> setup.  This is what _I think_ happened to you.  (?)
>
> With aeolus-conductor 0.10.4 + aeolus-configure 2.6.0,
> the person installing them needs to do the "-p admin" bit
> for aeolus-configure.
>
> The later ones don't need it, because _together_ they've got
> the right bits in place to automatically create it.
>
> _In theory_ those earlier version rpms should have been
> updated in the stable repo with the newer conductor 0.10.5
> and configure 2.6.1 rpms.  Both at the same time. (to avoid
> broken systems)
>
> _In reality_ though, things didn't go like that.  The newer
> conductor rpms made it into the stable repo, but the new
> configure one didn't.  (it's just been scheduled)
>
> Result -> People will need to manually ensure they have a
> matching rpm set, else they won't be able to log into their
> new Aeolus system.  It could be this way for 48 hours or
> so too, until the F16 mirror propagation thing happens.
>
> Did I explain that decently, and was that helpful to get
> your system into a working state? :)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> --
> Aeolus Community Manager
> http://www.aeolusproject.org
>
hi Justin,

looking at 
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11763 I can 
see aeolus-configure-2.6.1 
<http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=72512> built 
for f17;f18.

Any reason why not to build there a one for f16?

thanks.
Garik.




More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list