RFC: Git workflow

John Eckersberg jeckersb at redhat.com
Fri Feb 17 17:21:02 UTC 2012


On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:16:55 -0500, Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> wrote:
> What about upstream releases? When we're back to regular dev sprint, we 
> want to have end-of-sprint upstream releases. While we may push these 
> all to rawhide, we won't want to update the in-release-fedora versions 
> of Aeolus for every end-of-sprint, since we want packages in released 
> fedora to be reasonably stable.
> 
> Stated another way, fedora isn't a place to host upstream releases -- 
> it's an aggregator of upstream, not a source of upstream. In fact, 
> fedora spec files are supposed to include the URL to the canonical 
> upstream location for the upstream release -- which for the moment is 
> fedorapeople. In addition, upstream releases are for more than just 
> RHEL/Fedora We may be able to do away with an upstream yum repo as long 
> as we host rpms/gems/tarballs/etc for each release on aeolusproject.org.

Agreed 100%.  A++++ poster would read again!



More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list