RFC: Git workflow
John Eckersberg
jeckersb at redhat.com
Fri Feb 17 17:21:02 UTC 2012
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:16:55 -0500, Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> wrote:
> What about upstream releases? When we're back to regular dev sprint, we
> want to have end-of-sprint upstream releases. While we may push these
> all to rawhide, we won't want to update the in-release-fedora versions
> of Aeolus for every end-of-sprint, since we want packages in released
> fedora to be reasonably stable.
>
> Stated another way, fedora isn't a place to host upstream releases --
> it's an aggregator of upstream, not a source of upstream. In fact,
> fedora spec files are supposed to include the URL to the canonical
> upstream location for the upstream release -- which for the moment is
> fedorapeople. In addition, upstream releases are for more than just
> RHEL/Fedora We may be able to do away with an upstream yum repo as long
> as we host rpms/gems/tarballs/etc for each release on aeolusproject.org.
Agreed 100%. A++++ poster would read again!
More information about the aeolus-devel
mailing list