RFC: Git workflow

Matt Wagner matt.wagner at redhat.com
Thu Feb 16 16:29:06 UTC 2012


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:18:06AM +0100, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
> I assumed (maybe incorrectly) that this is a temporary
> release-related thing and we'd revert to the good ole master-based
> development later.
> 
> If that's not the case, I'm definitely in favour of developing on
> master -- provided eggs and eck can make that work.

I could have written the exact same email that Tomas wrote. I was under
the impression (perhaps erroneous) that this workflow was just until we
switched from bugfixing to new development, at which time we'd go back
to master.

If that's not the case, is it possible to make it so?

-- Matt



More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list