On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
Just to mention it:
We also seem to be having problems with packages using -maes.
I am not 100% sure yet, but I recently have been hit by fc26 updates
(nspr*), which appear to work on Atoms (w/ aes) but broke on original Intel
i686 (w/o aes).
That's a good point, thanks for bringing it up Ralf. We need to
include it in our target hardware discussion.
> why not aim for maximum compatibility?
Well, for me, it would be sufficient if Fedora >= 26 would support the i686
like Fedora < 26 did. I am not much interested in i586s or VIA chipsets.
Yes, I think that is a good goal at a minimum. If we can cover
i586/VIA with a minimum effort, I'm interested in trying. I consider
it a "stretch goal", so to speak.
jeff
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.backus(a)gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus