I might have missed something, when/why did we setup a FedoraMainGroup. Were we having issues?
-Mike
On 6/2/07, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
I might have missed something, when/why did we setup a FedoraMainGroup. Were we having issues?
-Mike
In the past, we had an issue with new users/contributors adding stuff and changing things around in our *FedoraMain* page without discussing in the list. So I took an initiative to add acl with FedoraMainGroup[1]. Most of them are active project contributors including active websites team and ambassadors team. I hope you all agree with me since this is our *Face* for Fedora Project. :)
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMainGroup
Regards,
Thomas Chung wrote:
On 6/2/07, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
I might have missed something, when/why did we setup a FedoraMainGroup. Were we having issues?
-Mike
In the past, we had an issue with new users/contributors adding stuff and changing things around in our *FedoraMain* page without discussing in the list. So I took an initiative to add acl with FedoraMainGroup[1]. Most of them are active project contributors including active websites team and ambassadors team. I hope you all agree with me since this is our *Face* for Fedora Project. :)
Well not anymore since we have static html pages. We should think about redesigning the front page in the wiki though I dont any solid ideas on where it should be focusing on.
Rahul
Op zondag 03-06-2007 om 01:49 uur [tijdzone +0530], schreef Rahul Sundaram:
Thomas Chung wrote:
On 6/2/07, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
I might have missed something, when/why did we setup a FedoraMainGroup. Were we having issues?
-Mike
In the past, we had an issue with new users/contributors adding stuff and changing things around in our *FedoraMain* page without discussing in the list. So I took an initiative to add acl with FedoraMainGroup[1]. Most of them are active project contributors including active websites team and ambassadors team. I hope you all agree with me since this is our *Face* for Fedora Project. :)
Well not anymore since we have static html pages. We should think about redesigning the front page in the wiki though I dont any solid ideas on where it should be focusing on.
Rahul
I'm just identifying some ideas, don't really know what to do with it aswell:
1. move the main Projects page up to the frontpage, creating a "dive into Fedora" feeling
2. move the main Join page up, so we can give people some directions (or just add the 6 icons and link to the Join-page)
3. let FWN use this, so people get the news on every Fedora project, by going to the frontpage of the wiki (latest issue gets promoted to the frontpage)
4. Do a combination of some of the above (FWN + with each different topic the relevant join-icons, ...)
Maybe we should consider what the use of the wiki will be from now on? As Plone is coming, I can imagine it being the number 1 spot for all the project-related information. Then again I could be utterly wrong.
Thoughts, suggestions?
Bart
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 22:32 +0200, Bart Couvreur wrote:
Maybe we should consider what the use of the wiki will be from now on? As Plone is coming, I can imagine it being the number 1 spot for all the project-related information. Then again I could be utterly wrong.
I think each sub-project should have a place that is part of Plone, to take advantage of the ecosystem.
There can continue to be related pages in the wiki, in the same namespace.
Otherwise, I'm liking the idea of "community documentation" here. The click-through CLA is likely to open the door to more people interested in light editing and contributing.
The best idea is to give a good, strong hierarchy/structure people can hang content from.
- Karsten
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 11:56 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:
On 6/2/07, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
I might have missed something, when/why did we setup a FedoraMainGroup. Were we having issues?
-Mike
In the past, we had an issue with new users/contributors adding stuff and changing things around in our *FedoraMain* page without discussing in the list. So I took an initiative to add acl with FedoraMainGroup[1]. Most of them are active project contributors including active websites team and ambassadors team. I hope you all agree with me since this is our *Face* for Fedora Project. :)
Yes, this is one of the "mostly immutable" pages in the Wiki. Just because we don't want a link farm there, it's not the right solution, and everyone will fight to put up their favorites. Search, search, and better search our the proper solutions there. :)
However, for the rest of the Wiki, we are moving rapidly to dropping the EditGroup ACL:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2007-June/msg00036...
- Karsten
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org