Dan Kenigsberg has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: rest-api: Model VMs ......................................................................
Patch Set 8: I would prefer that you didn't submit this
(1 inline comment)
.................................................... Commit Message Line 44: by the API. I'm afraid that I fail to think of a sane way to store non-running VMs in vdsm. In "sane" I mean that it cannot be host-specific (migration/ split brain woos) and modular enough to allow a central out-of-vdsm database, such as that of ovirt-Engine.
Without that, I do not see how we can step forward with #2, so my vote goes with #1.
-- To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/3756 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibed650a0215e7d841f5af0dd5f111a3e4a27ecf1 Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Project: vdsm Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Adam Litke agl@us.ibm.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Adam Litke agl@us.ibm.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Kenigsberg danken@redhat.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Gal Hammer ghammer@redhat.com