Hi all,
I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
- reviewers are missing! - reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them. - functional tests: Wenchao Xia's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4454 and Adam Litke's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4451 - Saggi's unicode fixes to betterPopen - Stories about negative flows hurt by commit 1676396f18cf5c300d87e181 "Change safelease APIs to match SANLock flow" - Upcoming oVirt-3.1 release: when to break from master branch?
Anyone else has more interesting stuff? We can skip my bullets for a few of yours if we do not have time.
Regards, Dan.
How about the new repository system latest status? http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,192
On 2012-5-21 3:55, Ayal Baron wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
- reviewers are missing!
- reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them.
- functional tests: Wenchao Xia's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4454 and Adam Litke's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4451
- Saggi's unicode fixes to betterPopen
- Stories about negative flows hurt by commit 1676396f18cf5c300d87e181 "Change safelease APIs to match SANLock flow"
- Upcoming oVirt-3.1 release: when to break from master branch?
Anyone else has more interesting stuff? We can skip my bullets for a few of yours if we do not have time.
Regards, Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:55:44PM +0300, Ayal Baron wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
- reviewers are missing!
- reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them.
Adam would find a volunteer to do that.
Regarding the new image model - Adam, could you see if your model fits Saggi's futuristic take (and vice versa)? Eduardo told me that he does not see the "Image" as an object that should be modeled at all. I hope he has constructive suggestions to Adam's API.
Ayal suggests that Adam ramp us up regarding cherrypy and his REST patches in general. Maybe something more dramatic than ping'ing about patches, such as an online review, would move this forward.
- functional tests: Wenchao Xia's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4454 and Adam Litke's http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4451
Adam's version gained some valuable acks. I do find the terms tests/run_tests_local.sh.in / check-local confusing. In one case "local" means "check source tree, not installed instance". In the second case "local" means "run static tests on source tree, not unit tests".
But if we do not come up with a better name, we can stay with this overloading.
- Saggi's unicode fixes to betterPopen
Federico would review today.
- Stories about negative flows hurt by commit 1676396f18cf5c300d87e181 "Change safelease APIs to match SANLock flow"
Minor change posted upstream
- Upcoming oVirt-3.1 release: when to break from master branch?
We could strive to push MOM integration. The burden would mainly lie on Mark and Adam - we need to have it pushed to Vdsm by May 28th so we can give a candidate vdsm for oVirt-3.1 on June 1st.
Don, Justin and Ricky from Netapp (forgive me if I got your names wrong) are to integrate libstorage, netapp controller and vdsm, for provisioning NFS exports.
Regards, Dan.
(this time, I'm not faking someone else's envelope)
Don, Justin and Ricky from Netapp (forgive me if I got your names wrong) are to integrate libstorage, netapp controller and vdsm, for provisioning NFS exports.
Hello, I could not join the vdsm call yesterday. Can someone please help provide info on the above ? Is this about VDSM-libstoragemgmt integration? I am already working with Ayal and Tony in carving the specifics on the same, and will be creating a wikipage soon.
Hey Deepak,
In a nutshell, the plan was to use libstoragemgmt as the middleman between VDSM and the NetApp controller. Since both LSM has Python bindings and VDSM is written in Python, we figured it would be a logical step to get a proof of concept at the very least. When you get the wikipage up, would you mind shooting me a link? I'd love to have a look!
By the way, the names are supposed to be Jon, Dustin, and Ricky :-)
-- Dustin
-----Original Message----- From: vdsm-devel-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:vdsm-devel-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Deepak C Shetty Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:23 AM To: Dan Kenigsberg Cc: VDSM Project Development Subject: Re: [vdsm] Agenda for tomorrow's call
Don, Justin and Ricky from Netapp (forgive me if I got your names wrong) are to integrate libstorage, netapp controller and vdsm, for provisioning NFS exports.
Hello, I could not join the vdsm call yesterday. Can someone please help provide info on the above ? Is this about VDSM-libstoragemgmt integration? I am already working with Ayal and Tony in carving the specifics on the same, and will be creating a wikipage soon.
_______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
On 05/22/2012 07:01 PM, Schoenbrun, Dustin wrote:
Hey Deepak,
In a nutshell, the plan was to use libstoragemgmt as the middleman between VDSM and the NetApp controller. Since both LSM has Python bindings and VDSM is written in Python, we figured it would be a logical step to get a proof of concept at the very least. When you get the wikipage up, would you mind shooting me a link? I'd love to have a look!
Yes, definitely. I will post the integration plan on the list as well as create a wikipage, soon. Ccing ayal and tony too.
thanx, deepak
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:31:11PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:55:44PM +0300, Ayal Baron wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
- reviewers are missing!
- reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them.
Adam would find a volunteer to do that.
Regarding the new image model - Adam, could you see if your model fits Saggi's futuristic take (and vice versa)? Eduardo told me that he does not see the "Image" as an object that should be modeled at all. I hope he has constructive suggestions to Adam's API.
Hmm, interesting... In Beijing I was told that images (not Volumes) were the object to be modelled. It would be nice to have some coordination and clarity on this.
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org