From: "ybronhei" <ybronhei(a)redhat.com>
To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>, "VDSM Project
Development" <vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>,
"Piotr Kliczewski" <piotr.kliczewski(a)gmail.com>, "Doron
Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 6:33:56 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] vdsm sync meeting minutes Feb 24th, 2014
On 02/24/2014 05:06 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
> vdsm sync call Feb 24th 2014
> =============================
>
> - Toni to add Douglas to the linkPool patch so it can go into the build.
> - Try and give karma to iscsiadm bug
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1057761
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.12.1-74.19.fc19
> Needs to be backported as well. Douglas offers to help with the testing
> for
> karma giving.
> - TLV meeting:
> - Design and architecture discussion: Nir proposes to go over the
> general
> design. Dispatcher, tasks. Adam agrees with the design request and
> warns
> about Python constructs for the possibility of hidden pitfalls.
>
> - Style guide discussion: Documentation, idioms, etc. Nir, Adam and Toni
> subscribe that. Adam proposes pushing for smaller patches. Toni pushes
> for
> topic branches of smaller patches that are considered in the context
> of the
> branch and not as self-standing patches.
>
> - JSON rpc discussion: Revive? plan etc. Adam wants to talk about the
> needs
> to make the engine start using JSON and get rid of the hacks. AMQP
> plans.
> Find ways to deprecate XMLRPC and get the API consistent in its
> representations.
>
> - Task creation: Nir proposes to discuss the way in which tasks are
> handled
> between engine and vdsm, so that the task uuid is pushed from the
> engine.
>
> - Get some presentation about SLA side of thinks. Adam asks if maybe
> Martin
> or Doron could do that?
> _______________________________________________
> vdsm-devel mailing list
> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
>
Hey,
sorry to miss the call today, I was at first but dropped after we
started the discussion and failed to join back
the json rpc part is merged to vdsm, pushed by saggi and Piotr, maybe
Piotr can add more plan's details about that part?
about the design and architecture discussion, i also think we should
talk how we can improve\refactor mainly the tasks infrastructure, i know
that some groups have stable roadmap plans (not only SLA) that can be
shared for discussion and review (mostly storage parts - e.g. removing
the pool concept), and we'll discuss about more suggestions for
improvement that will be raised.
--
Yaniv Bronhaim.
Hi guys,
Martin is joining you to help where possible.
Please let me know what are you aiming for and we'll make sure you have the SLA view
for it.
In general I can tell you we have a few things planned for the next 2++ versions, so
we need to focus on the relevant parts of your meetup.