----- Original Message -----
From: "Michal Skrivanek"
<michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com>
To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, "Itamar Heim"
<iheim(a)redhat.com>, board(a)ovirt.org
Cc: vdsm-devel(a)fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:53:50 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] suggesting new Vdsm maintaniner(s)
On Aug 8, 2013, at 11:00 , Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
>> ======================================================
>>
>> During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development,
>> both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and
>> evolution of the the project.
>>
>> They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when
>> reviewing patches.
>>
>> Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network
>> configuration and reporting
>>
>> 27 vdsm/configNetwork.py
>> 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py
>> 8 vdsm/API.py
>> 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py
>> 7 vdsm/netinfo.py
>> 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py
>> 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py
>> 4 vdsm/netmodels.py
>>
>> ... similar to Mark's 80:
>>
>> 16 vdsm/configNetwork.py
>> 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py
>> 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py
>> 7 vdsm/clientIF.py
>> 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py
>> 5 vdsm/caps.py
>> 5 vdsm/API.py
>> 4 vdsm/vm.py
>> 4 vdsm/netmodels.py
>> 4 vdsm/Makefile.am
>>
>> I suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding
>> that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is
>> particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
>>
>> What do you say?
>
> We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe
> it's due to the summer season.
Likely. My late loud +1
> To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch
> (+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it
> if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid).
>
> Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say,
> one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights?
Sounds like the time is now…
Agreed, delaying it just overloads Federico during the recent period.
With adding new maintainers I hope we'll have more attendance in vdsm calls and
contributes will receive faster response and help
Thanks,
Yaniv Bronhaim.
> Dan.
> _______________________________________________
> vdsm-devel mailing list
> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel