On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:52:36AM +0000, Sven Kieske wrote:
Hi,
any news regarding my questions?
Am 29.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Sandro Bonazzola:
Il 29/01/2014 09:21, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
Hi,
I wanted to try it the other way around, installing vdsm-python-cpopen and check if it runs without python-cpopen .
But that leads me to a question:
Is there any difference between these packages beside their different name?
If yes, what is the difference and which package should be installed? I no, why is there a packet vdsm-python-cpopen ?
CCing VDSM
python-cpopen includes some improvements and bug fixes, that are going to be needed in ovirt-3.4. vdsm-python-cpopen is shipped by ovirt-3.3.
python-cpopen wast intended to deprecate and replace vdsm-python-cpopen, but we have had way too many issues trying to do that properly in rpm/yum. Most of the bugs are ours, at least one is yum's.
At the moment, the existence of python-cpopen in Fedora confuses `yum install vdsm`.
To avoid this unfortunate delay, we can either include python-cpopen in ovirt-stable or exclude vdsm-python-cpopen from there. Both options are unfavorable, but so is continuing to wait.
Regards, Dan.