-----Original Message----- From: vdsm-devel-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:vdsm-devel-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On
Behalf Of Adam Litke Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 21:02 PM To: VDSM Project Development Subject: Re: fileSD: Fix remotePath in SD metadata (V2)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:37:19PM -0400, Itamar Heim wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: vdsm-devel-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:vdsm-devel-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On
Behalf Of Adam Litke Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 19:25 PM To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Subject: fileSD: Fix remotePath in SD metadata (V2)
Changes since V1:
- Derive the remotePath from self.mountpoint instead of using the
metadata
Any reason the patches are being sent here, rather than to
vdsm-patches?
vdsm-patches appears to be the output of a program. Is this gerrit? I
guess I
just assumed that my patch would appear there once someone entered it
into that
system. I believe I am making the first non-Red Hat contribution. What
is the
correct public patch submission process?
Well, pushing via gerrit, once we get the public one going. Idea is patches are discussed on vdsm-patches, and non patch issues here (a discussion on a patch may go here if foundational I guess)
-- Adam Litke agl@us.ibm.com IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel