On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:31:11PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:55:44PM +0300, Ayal Baron wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
- reviewers are missing!
- reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them.
Adam would find a volunteer to do that.
Regarding the new image model - Adam, could you see if your model fits Saggi's futuristic take (and vice versa)? Eduardo told me that he does not see the "Image" as an object that should be modeled at all. I hope he has constructive suggestions to Adam's API.
Hmm, interesting... In Beijing I was told that images (not Volumes) were the object to be modelled. It would be nice to have some coordination and clarity on this.