On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:08AM +0800, bigclouds wrote:
i find a bug fixed 1 year ago.
type=VIRT_CONTROL msg=audit(1379813127.359:42015): user pid=1637 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='virt=kvm op=start reason=booted vm="testname-1" uuid=24f7e975-9aa5-4a14-b0f0-590add14c8b5 vm-pid=-1 exe="/usr/sbin/libvirtd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=failed' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835936
but in my case, i have 'setenforce 0',
If there's an SELinux-related regression, we should understand it, not hide it with `setenforce 0` ;-) Which is the version of your selinux-policy rpm?
i had not noticed both of you online on irc channel. how could you review my code and talk about it. thanks
Sorry, we have plenty of holidays this time of year.
You are most welcome to post the code on-list, or to vdsm's gerrit (if you would like to contribute it to vdsm_hooks).
Dan