On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: <snip>
Improvement of the Guest Agent:
As part of the proposed solution it is necessary to improve the guest agent as well.
Improving the agent may be a good idea, but I do not see the necessity in it.
The guest agent is doing 'expensive' queries (e.g. "application_list") way too often. And things like network interfaces, disk usage and installed applications won't usually change every n minutes. Those queries could be much more reactive then proactive.
Of course, but as I said:
It's also important to improve the horrible multithreaded vdsm/libvirt statistics acquisition, but just as unrelated to the core of this feature.
I think it is misleading to include this in the discussion about vdsm/Engine interface change.