Hi everyone. I just wanted to survey the group to see if anyone objects if I add the VDSM mailing lists to the gmane mailing list archive. Any problems with this?
On 09/28/2011 12:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
Hi everyone. I just wanted to survey the group to see if anyone objects if I add the VDSM mailing lists to the gmane mailing list archive. Any problems with this?
No objection from me (not that I have a say here necessarily), but should we wait until this list migrates over to smth like vdsm-devel@ovirt.org?
Ayal, when can we move the list over to join engine and node?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Perry Myers wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
Hi everyone. I just wanted to survey the group to see if anyone objects if I add the VDSM mailing lists to the gmane mailing list archive. Any problems with this?
No objection from me (not that I have a say here necessarily), but should we wait until this list migrates over to smth like vdsm-devel@ovirt.org?
Yes, good point.
----- Original Message -----
On 09/28/2011 12:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
Hi everyone. I just wanted to survey the group to see if anyone objects if I add the VDSM mailing lists to the gmane mailing list archive. Any problems with this?
No objection from me (not that I have a say here necessarily), but should we wait until this list migrates over to smth like vdsm-devel@ovirt.org?
Ayal, when can we move the list over to join engine and node?
I see no reason to move the lists. We've had this discussion and determined that seeing as vdsm is already on fedorahosted, there is no compelling reason to move.
wrt gmane, I have no objections to that.
acathrow@redhat.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Perry Myers" pmyers@redhat.com Cc: "VDSM Project Development" vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:57:05 PM Subject: Re: Does anyone object to adding the vdsm lists to gmane?
----- Original Message -----
On 09/28/2011 12:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
Hi everyone. I just wanted to survey the group to see if anyone objects if I add the VDSM mailing lists to the gmane mailing list archive. Any problems with this?
No objection from me (not that I have a say here necessarily), but should we wait until this list migrates over to smth like vdsm-devel@ovirt.org?
Ayal, when can we move the list over to join engine and node?
I see no reason to move the lists. We've had this discussion and determined that seeing as vdsm is already on fedorahosted, there is no compelling reason to move.
moving it to ovirt.org rathre than fedora does highlight the independent nature of VDSM rather than being a Fedora or Red Hat only project.
Aic
wrt gmane, I have no objections to that.
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 07:45:41PM -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
acathrow@redhat.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Perry Myers" pmyers@redhat.com Cc: "VDSM Project Development" vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:57:05 PM Subject: Re: Does anyone object to adding the vdsm lists to gmane?
----- Original Message -----
On 09/28/2011 12:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
Hi everyone. I just wanted to survey the group to see if anyone objects if I add the VDSM mailing lists to the gmane mailing list archive. Any problems with this?
No objection from me (not that I have a say here necessarily), but should we wait until this list migrates over to smth like vdsm-devel@ovirt.org?
Ayal, when can we move the list over to join engine and node?
I see no reason to move the lists. We've had this discussion and determined that seeing as vdsm is already on fedorahosted, there is no compelling reason to move.
moving it to ovirt.org rathre than fedora does highlight the independent nature of VDSM rather than being a Fedora or Red Hat only project.
Only to a small degree. Moving a mailing list might impact the first impressions, but far more important than that, is whether the code actually works on non-Fedora/RHEL platforms. In other words, ff you can demonstrate the code is portable & works, the mailing list hosting location will just become a minor curiosity.
So, IMHO, the most significant thing that would demonstrate the independent nature of VDSM, would be for someone to actually do the work get it running on a Debian host and make a point that this is a targetted platform for releases.
There are currently some Fedora-isms in the code that will prevent this, the biggest one I know of being the host network interface setup. This is one we've been preparing to deal with for a while, by adding transactional network change support to libvirt's host networking API. With this now in place, and netcf ported to Debian, moving VDSM to use libvirt's network API would be a significant step forward in portability to non-Fedora OS.
Regards, Daniel
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
moving it to ovirt.org rathre than fedora does highlight the independent nature of VDSM rather than being a Fedora or Red Hat only project.
Only to a small degree. Moving a mailing list might impact the first impressions, but far more important than that, is whether the code actually works on non-Fedora/RHEL platforms. In other words, ff you can demonstrate the code is portable & works, the mailing list hosting location will just become a minor curiosity.
So, IMHO, the most significant thing that would demonstrate the independent nature of VDSM, would be for someone to actually do the work get it running on a Debian host and make a point that this is a targetted platform for releases.
I completely agree with this.
There are currently some Fedora-isms in the code that will prevent this, the biggest one I know of being the host network interface setup. This is one we've been preparing to deal with for a while, by adding transactional network change support to libvirt's host networking API. With this now in place, and netcf ported to Debian, moving VDSM to use libvirt's network API would be a significant step forward in portability to non-Fedora OS.
Hmm, interesting. I am going to have to play around with this now. Thanks for pointing it out.
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org