* Itamar Heim iheim@redhat.com [2012-08-01 08:27]:
On 08/01/2012 04:20 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
- Itamar Heim iheim@redhat.com [2012-07-25 08:50]:
On 07/25/2012 04:36 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
- Eyal Edri eedri@redhat.com [2012-07-18 11:59]:
I'm in favor on doing it next monday. (not too healthy to do upgrades before the weekend...).
We'll need to send email to rhev-devel + qe for an estimated downtime of 1 hour for gerrit.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com.
Any update?
I've sent an update earlier today to infra that i'm planning to upgrade gerrit to 2.4.2 coming sunday. after a few days of a clean upgrade, I'll do the patched version of it.
How'd the upgrade go? any ETA for when the patched version will show up?
too early to say - gerrit already required a restart today after hanging. Gal already created a patched version for me to deploy, but i want to see the gerrit behavior for a few more days before i apply it. (btw, i think gerrit 2.5 has some improvements over the original patches (like max size, etc.), but we'll wait with them for 2.5 i guess.
How's gerrit behaving? Ready for the patched version?
Thanks!
Ryan
Ryan
Eyal.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Ryan Harper" ryanh@us.ibm.com Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" danken@redhat.com, "Adam Litke" agl@us.ibm.com, "Anthony Liguori" aliguori@us.ibm.com, "VDSM Project Development" vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "Eyal Edri" eedri@redhat.com, "Attila Darazs" adarazs@redhat.com, "Moran Goldboim" mgoldboi@redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:48:01 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] minutes: today's call
On 07/18/2012 06:24 PM, Ryan Harper wrote: >* Itamar Heim iheim@redhat.com [2012-05-16 10:26]: >>On 05/16/2012 06:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >>>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: >>>>* Dan Kenigsbergdanken@redhat.com [2012-05-07 05:42]: >>>>>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >>>>>>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote: >>>>>>>On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote: >>>>>>>>Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I would like to discuss the following on today's call: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>1. Gerrit vs. mailing list >>>>>> >>>>>>Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors. >>>>>>One approach to solve this improve gerrit: >>>>>>- Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. >>>>>>This may >>>>>> attract more reviewers. >>>>> >>>>>I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to >>>>>upstream >>>>>gerrit: >>>>>https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/ >>>>>Add unified diff to newchange mail template. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to >>>>include the >>>>full patch in the email? >>> >>>You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-) >> >>indeed, please help push them upstream... >>https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/ >>https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/ >> >>> >>>> >>>>I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and >>>>changes; helps >>>>me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy >>>>seeing the >>>>the patch series attached (via threading) as well. >>> >>>Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these >>>patches to >>>ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream? >> >>yes we can. >>after i'll upgrade it to 2.3, which i prefer to do after i return >>from PTO in case there are some issues with the upgrade. >>so ETA end of the month for clean upgrade to 2.3, then after we >>see >>all is ok, let's say another week to upgrade to the version with >>these patches. > >It's about 6 weeks later. Dan's been asking for more review in >vdsm; >I know that I'd be able to review quite a bit more if I can get >patches >via email instead of the webui. > >Can we get this enabled? > >
eyal/attila - any ETA on testing gerrit 2.4 (.2 by now) so we can upgrade to it?