On 11/02/2016 06:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/03/16 08:59, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 05:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:41:08AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>>> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso [...]
>>> 14-Jun-2016 17:13 1G
>>> Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-24-1.2.iso [...]
>>> 14-Jun-2016 17:27 2G
>> I don't know the answer offhand, but do be aware that this looks more
>> dramatic than the actual difference, because of rounding to whole GB
>> values. The 64-bit iso is 1.47GiB while the 32-bit one is 1.60GiB — the
>> actual difference is 129MiB. It just happens to straddle 1.5 so looks
>> dramatic when rounded to whole numbers.
> Wow! I didn't realize it was that close. The two kernels and ramdisks
> could explain that easily.
>
Yes, if you had both iso's you'd see....
-rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1676673024 Jun 15 01:27
Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-24-1.2.iso
-rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1541406720 Jun 15 01:13
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso
A difference of 135,266,304. :-)
I USED to have every ISO image ever made going back to FC1 (even some
old Red Hat and Slackware stuff), but I started to prune the tree a
couple of years ago. Now I only have the images I'll use (64-bit F18
through F24, both XFCE and server spins).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks(a)alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- Never eat anything larger than your head -
----------------------------------------------------------------------