On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
>> this output makes sense.
>>
> I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it
> drops them from the attempt.
But why is it trying to include them in the first place? There are no
older versions of those packages installed, and they're not dependencies
of the packages that are being updated.
That's why I requested the debugdata so we know exact dependencies and
your system state where you can reproduce the problem ;). It shows
updating + skipped section together and should show all packages that
could be updated (like output of check-upgrade).
Honza