On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:33 AM Jack Craig <jack.craig.aptos@gmail.com> wrote:

this part looked ok to me, but i am not sure.

now seeing higher throughput, but still got...

14-Nov-2020 11:28:20.993 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760 52.183.97.231#63450 (linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
14-Nov-2020 11:28:21.030 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760 20.190.57.96#61806 (www.linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
14-Nov-2020 11:28:21.047 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760 51.143.102.160#49893 (www.linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270

how can i see/test a query's processing between default.log & security.log ?
i can see the query, if i could see why it's failing, i'd query this list less. ;)

www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270

i looked at the query.c @7270 but was unable to gleen any useful insight.

WRT networking, my block of static ip's is from att.com

i have cascaded routers from att's pace unit to a netgear night hawk that does
port fwding for 53, 80 443 to the 10.0.0.101 sever.
i use the firewall on the att rtr limiting to the above ports to pass through.

the NH logs show connects to 53,80, & 443

i also cranked debug to 10 in named logging, but so far,...

lastly, as F32 comes w/iptables, i migrated to nftables.