On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:28 AM Michael D. Setzer II <
mikes@guam.net> wrote:
On 20 Sep 2023 at 19:57, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
From: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela@redhat.com>
Date sent: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:57:31 +0200
Subject: Re: Noticed Failed message with selinux-policy-targeted on 3 of 5 machines??
To: mikes@guam.net,
Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:25 AM Michael D. Setzer II via users
> <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> In running dnf update on 5 machines noticed a fail message on 3 or 5?
> To double check ran dnf reinstall selinux* and get this on failing
> systems?
>
> Running transaction check
> Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transaction test
> Transaction test succeeded.
> Running transaction
> Running scriptlet:
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1
> Running scriptlet:
> selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1
> Preparing : 1/1
> Reinstalling : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8
> Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
> Reinstalling :
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
> Reinstalling : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
> Failed to resolve allow statement at
> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186
> Failed to resolve AST
> /usr/sbin/semodule: Failed!
>
> Reinstalling : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8
> Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8
> Cleanup : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8
> Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
> Cleanup : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
> Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
> Cleanup : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8
> Cleanup : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
> Running scriptlet :
> selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8
> Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
>
> Reinstalled:
> selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
> selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
> selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
> selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
>
> Complete!
>
> Other day get a message about about regex version not matching, and
> was told to
> reintall container-selinux. That doesn't seem to fix issue.
> Did find changing to minimum option gets rid of the regex message?
> But why 2 of the machines seem to have no problem, but other 3 get
> same message?
> Michael,
>
> The update restults may depend on other components or if some
> customizations are in place. What version is container-selinux?
>
> rpm -qa "selinux-policy*" "*-selinux"
>
rpm -qa | grep selinux-policy
selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-doc-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
I wanted to see other packages, too. Maybe also
semodule -lfull | grep -v ^100
Noticed one machine that gets failed didn't have selinux-policy-doc
installed and installed it, then tried reinstalling all the
selinux-policy and still got error?
Failed to resolve allow statement at
/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186
Failed to resolve AST
/usr/sbin/semodule: Failed!
Files in that directory are
-rw-------. 1 root root 2 Sep 21 08:09 lang_ext
-rw-------. 1 root root 24411 Sep 21 08:09 hll
-rw-------. 1 root root 13487 Sep 21 08:09 cil
The cil file is a binary file, so not sure what :1186 means?
that tmp directory doesn't exist on my notebook that doesn't have
error?
It's a temporary directory used for the policy rebuild. Try this:
f39# file /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil
/var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil: bzip2 compressed data, block size = 500k
f39# file -z /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil
/var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil: ASCII text, with very long lines (446) (bzip2 compressed data, block size = 500k)
f39# bunzip2 </var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil | sed -n '1180,1187p'
What's in the output?
set selinux to minimal on machines.
Don't understand this.
> I cannot reproduce your problem using any updating path with the latest
> package versions.
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.or
> g
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
>
> --
>
> Zdenek Pytela
> Security SELinux team
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired)
mailto:mikes@guam.net
mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com
Guam - Where America's Day Begins
G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+------------------------------------------------------------+