On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:38:55PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/18/2016 09:29 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>Yes, dnf would have been a good time for this. I can only guess early
>on something important switching over to dnf blew up spectacularly
>without it, and it was easier to put in a backward compatible
>deprecated subcommand than fight reality.
Actually, the easiest thing would have been to make update and upgrade
execute the same code, so that people could use whichever they preferred
without having to maintain two chunks of code that do essentially the same
Isn't that what this manpage item says?
dnf [options] update
Deprecated alias for the Upgrade Command.
Jon H. LaBadie jonfu(a)jgcomp.com