Hi,
I am  getting this exact problem since about a week or two weeks ago that I noticed.
Still no resolution?
Thx

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 1:08 PM stan via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:05 -0400
Tom Horsley <horsley1953@gmail.com> wrote:

> For a few days now, I've been getting update errors because
> (apparently) the 32 bit pam isn't yet in the repos even though the 64
> bit version is newer:

They build from the same source package,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2010513
so they should be in sync.  Maybe the i686 package isn't getting
karma and will only be posted when the karma / testing period
expires.

[snip]

> I'm not sure why I currently have 32 bit pam installed, any drastic
> consequences for removing all the 32 bit pam packages? There certainly
> doesn't appear to be a vast number of packages dnf wants to remove
> if I say erase pam.i686 and pam-libs.i686.

If nothing is using it, and the x86_64 version is installed, there
should be no consequences.  But, I'm not speaking from any experience,
just general logic.  You could try moving the executable out of the
way, and see if there are any consequences.  If not, just move the
executable back and remove the package.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


--
------------------------------
 /\_/\  
 |O O|  pepebuho@gmail.com
 ~~~~     Javier Perez
 ~~~~          While the night runs
 ~~~~          toward the day...
  m m       Pepebuho watches
                from his high perch.