On 1/31/2024 12:21 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
$ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \ Additional internal header files for glibc-devel.
Do you also have glibc-devel installed?
Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides /use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers
Have you tried the "--verify" option of rpm to check if stdio.h is an isolated problem?
$ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86
$ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64
After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing.
Yes I used --verify as an rpm switch and all the files including stdio.h were in the rpm. So I tried 'dnf reinstall glibc-headers[-x86-2.38-14.fc49]. And all installed. what is in brackets I have left off before; thinking that the installation setup (anaconda) was smart enough to know what rpm to install and what arch my system is. So that is fixed now, but, I am still wondering why the installation of the system didn't install these rpms. I chose the option "C Development Tools" at install. hm.
Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)