On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:40 PM Jack Craig <jack.craig.aptos@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:06 PM Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@greshko.com> wrote:
On 27/03/2022 13:57, Jack Craig wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@greshko.com> wrote:
>
>     On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote:
>     > after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and for general internet access its fine.
>     > just not working with my configuration...
>     >
>     > at the moment, trying to find a static route option for att rtr.
>     >
>     > static routes on the internal router wont help, right??
>
>     I guess I don't really understand what HW and Physical Configuration.
>
>     You have a DSL router.  The router has 4 Ethernet ports.  In your configuration, what are these ports connected to?
>
>
> ok, ...
>
> (internet)--<att modem|bgw210700>-----lan connect---<netgear nighthawk>--lan connect-----[netgear switch]------<srvr>
>
> make sense?
>

Is your srvr configured manually?  Meaning, a static IP?

If so, try connecting the bgw210700 directly to the srvr.  Then try accessing sites from the server.

but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and 108.90.204.76.

still make sense??

192.168.1.254 is att rtr (i can'see',but not touch 108.90.204.0)
att rtr is dhcp 192.168.63-192.168.1.200)

10.0.0.1 is the NH using port mapping to map 108.220.213.121 <--> 10.0.0.101

is my configuration goal an unreasonable one?
 

--
Did 황준호 die?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure