On 5/2/19 8:32 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/30/19 8:33 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> You redirected the OP to test@, at a point in time, when - though fc30
> had not been formally announced - fc30 already had been in place on
> the download servers.
>
> That said, you were just behaving bureaucratic and nit-picking, IMHO.
Even though it had been technically "released", an upgrade problem right
at release is probably better brought to the attention of the QA people.
Are you seriously trying to tell us, these folks will look into reported
probs, when the release already was rubberstamped "go" several hours
before the OPs posting and technically in place on the mirrors?
Serious, I find this rediculous.