Ed Greshko wrote:
> Actually I don't think I've seen a good description of the
> differences. Both should have a fairly accurate rebuild of RHEL
> sources and timely updates from their repositories, but each has their
> own optional added-value content. Centos has the Centosplus
> repository with a kernel containing some drivers and filesystems
> present in fedora but removed from RHEL and some other things. I'm
> not sure what SL adds.
They add stuff that *their* user community needs to work in *their*
structured environment. The gory details are attached.
Thanks - it looks like quite a lot of generally-useful stuff too,
particularly the inclusion of a compatibly packaged Sun Java which is
rather difficult to come by in Centos-land.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com