On 10/02/2010 11:30 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, JD wrote:
> Not to be mean or anything....So please take it lightly:
> Did I say linux has issues in supporting large smp? NO!
> You are answering your own question. not mine.
...
> Did I say anything about application support? No!
> Again, you are answering your own question.
>
> I have found a few articles mentioning the smp granularity,
> but do not discuss the linux smp implementation within the
> context of granularity and overhead, and optimum degree
> of granularity.
Might be a language barrier on my part, but by your question, it wasn't
apparent (at least not to me) if you're talking the locking granularity
inside the Linux kernel (read: A theoretical question) or application
performance running on Linux.
As you talked about actual hardware (AMD Opteron CPU with 12 cores), I
-assumed- that you were talking about application performance.
-However-, saying "Taking it lightly" doesn't excuse you from "being
excellent to each other" rule. Your answer was rude and uncalled for.
- Gilboa
Sorry, Gilboa.
I felt that you were mis-steering the gist of my question.
Have a nice day!