On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 18:40 +0200, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:55 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
<pocallaghan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 12:35 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:46 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
> > <pocallaghan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I pointed out that a post relating to unreleased software should
> > > go on the Test list. That is the official policy of this list.
> >
> > AFAIK, it's from time that this email [1] is sent that the
"users"
> > list is ok, not from the time that this email [2] is sent out.
> >
> > [1] "is go", April 26:
> >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedora...
> >
> > [2] "released", April 30:
> >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedora...
>
> That's also a reasonable interpretation. I'll try to bear it in mind
> next time
It's not my interpretation. There was a thread similar to this one a
few years ago where someone said with authority (it seemed to me!)
that this was the policy.
Possibly, though I don't recall it. Maybe it should be written down
somewhere. Maybe it *is* written down somewhere ...
> (and believe me, there will inevitably be a next time ...)
We should unify the two lists so as not to have these delirious
threads on an almost twice-yearly basis.
I used to read the Test list as well as this one but stopped a couple
of years ago when I realised I wasn't getting much out of discussions
of Rawhide issues and decided to stick to the stable releases, so
unifying the lists would be a retrograde step in my view.
poc