On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:56 -0400, Marc Ferguson wrote:
The scan did pick up something for wifi0 and eth0. Does that mean
that they are conflicting in some way?
I don't think so. AFAIK the wifi0 is effectively a pseudo-interface on
top of eth0. Something to do with how the kernel drivers are
implemented, but don't take my word for it.
Anyone who knows more about this is welcome to jump in at this point :-)