Christofer C. Bell wrote:
On 2/22/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>No, it's not clear. First you complain about them removing
>the tradmarks, then continue with a complaint about when
>they tried to give some credit. Which is it you'd prefer?
>They were never pretending to 'be' RedHat but they did
>try to describe the origin and legal status of the product.
I would prefer they leave the distribution of Red Hat Enterpise Linux
to Red Hat Software, Incorporated. What you seem to be missing here
But they aren't doing that. RHEL includes quite a bit of
stuff not included in CentOS. Also, RHEL includes paid-for
support, which CentOS does not. CentOS is much more like Fedora,
in that both are "community support" (whatever that means).
is this, Les (and others): "I do not care what they do to be in
clear legally, I think they're in the moral wrong."
I think dousing your wife in gasoline and setting her on fire when
you're bored with her and want to marry someone else is morally wrong.
Well, you're getting a little bit extreme, aren't you?
Oh, and now I see what you meant in your private e-mail!
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!