Hi


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Ian Malone  wrote:
Others are coming up with conjectures and presenting them as fact to
back up a particular position (the one that it's the responsibility of
projects to chase the latest and greatest infrastructure change). 

There is no conjecture in what I said whatsoever.  It is purely a fact.  Remember that the original question was "Does it work with fvwm?" and "Hm, not really useful when it doesn`t work with existing WMs ...".  I was merely pointing out that Wayland is just a protocol.  Adding support for the protocol is done within the window managers and not the other way around.

> In their best interest if needed. But you didn't try to claim it's the
>*responsibility* of projects to change to Wayland.
Those two things are not in conflict.  If they do so, it would their responsibility to do the porting and maintain them.  Noone suggested that we should force them. 

Rahul