On 5/10/19 8:28 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the
ASUS was
>>> something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.
>>>
>>> This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X
>>>
>>> There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.
>>
>> Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through the ASUS
so that
>> he can do traffic control. He is getting too much traffic over the internet link
now
>> that he doesn't have that.
>
> Oh, right. Forgot all about that.
>
> Double-NAT seems like it could be a solution. But I've run into issues with
that. It was
> years ago so I can't recall the details.
Double NAT has seemed to work ok for us. It would be interesting to hear of counter
examples. I'm talking only about outbound connections here, BTW.
Right, outbound was fine. I'm pretty sure it was issues where port-forwarding or
UPnP
services were involved.
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color
scheme