El jue, 31-01-2013 a las 16:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
On 01/31/2013 04:44 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> On 01/27/2013 06:15 PM, Lailah wrote:
>> El vie, 25-01-2013 a las 22:40 +0100, Frantisek Hanzlik escribió:
>>> Joe Zeff wrote:
>>> > On 01/25/2013 12:46 PM, James Freer wrote:
>>> >> LOL - good reply! I must admit i do get fed up with the twin names. In
>>> >> the Precise version... it was very much IMprecise. Just too many bugs
>>> >> now to be worth using.
>>> >
>>> > It often seems to me that they're too concerned about making their names
>>> > cute for my taste, but I don't use it myself and keep my opinion to
>>> > myself for the most.  Now, alas, it's beginning to look like Fedora's
>>> > going down that path instead of marketing itself as a serious distro for
>>> > people who are more interested in how it works than in what it's called.
>>> >  Alas, from what I can see, unless I'm active as a Fedora dev (My
>>> > programming skills rusted away decades ago.) the only input I have to the
>>> > process is making suggestions.  None of us "mere users" have a vote.
>>>
>

I'd guess, it's people being dissatisfied with what they are used to, 
now being on a "quest for the better".

  That said, from what I've heard and read, Ubuntu is in a similar 
crisis as Fedora. What is Gnome3 in Fedora seems to be Unity in Ubuntu 
(users turning away), what's the anaconda-disaster in F18 seems to be a 
general stability in Ubuntu 12.10.


Of what stability are you talking about?  In Ubuntu I couldn't find it.  And Unity is worse than Gnome 3. 


Just my experience
Lailah