On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:17:53AM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
.........snip.........
>No, it doesn't *have to* change and will actively resist.
> Ignore and move on? Would you say the same thing if we, the state, threw
> you in prison for the use of the term? Civil society already does. Case in
> point: use of the term "my account has been hacked" or "...website had been
> hacked" have negative connotations; instead of looking to fix homes in
> faulty software, they blame someone for attacking them. This has to change.
No, they don't *have to* understand and will actively resist.
> People don't normally intend to rob a bank when they go in to make a
> withdrawal. They have to understand that the same goes for hackers.
What you're trying to change is human nature.
You are just going to let society walk all over you?